今天金博宝188官网小编为大家带来了请问2023年2月23日雅思阅读考试真题及答案（2023雅思阅读真题全面解析及答案(2)），希望能帮助到大家，一起来看看吧！
本文目录一览：
请问2023年2月23日雅思阅读考试真题及答案
您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。选择留学是人生重要的决策之一，而作为您的指导，我非常高兴能为您提供最准确的留学解答和规划。无论您的问题是关于考试准备、专业选择、申请流程还是学校信息，我都在这里为您解答。更多留学资讯和学校招生介绍，欢迎随时访问。前两天最新一期的雅思考试圆满结束了，真题及答案也已经新鲜出炉，想必大家都非常感兴趣吧。来和小钟老师看一看2023年2月23日雅思阅读考试真题及答案。
Passage 1
文章题材：说明文（人文历史）
文章题目：丝绸之路
文章难度：★★
文章内容：暂无
题型及数量：7填空题+6判断题
题目及答案：
1、robe
2、taxes
3、gold
4、待补充
5、foreign
6、thread
7、待补充
8、T
9、NG
10、F
11、NG
12、T
13、F
可参考真题：C11T3P1：The Story of Silk
Passage 2
文章题材：说明文（自然动植物）
文章题目：猛犸象
文章难度：★★★★
文章内容：文章介绍了猛犸象及其灭绝的原因猜想。
题型及数量：7填空+6匹配
题目及答案：
14. hunting
15. overkill model
16. disease/hyperdisease
17. empirical evidence
18. climatic instability
19. geographical
20. younger Dryas event
21. A
22. B
23. A
24. B
25. B
26. C
可参考真题：C9T1P3：The History of the Tortoise
考试原文：
Mammoth Kill
Mammoth is any species of the extinct genus Mammuthus， proboscideans commonly equipped with long， curved tusks and in northern species， a covering of long hair. They lived from the Ptiocene epoch from around 5 million years ago， into the Hotocene at about 4，500 years ago， and were members of the family Elephantidae， which contains， along with mammoths， the two genera of modern elephants and their ancestors.
A Like their modern relatives， mammoths were quite large. The largest known species reached heights in the region of 4m at the shoulder and weights up t0 8 tonnes， while exceptionally large males may have exceeded 12 tonnes. However， most species of mammoth were only about as large as a modern Asian elephant. Both sexes bore tusks. A first， small set appeared at about the age of six months and these were replaced at about 18 months by the permanent set. Growth of the permanent set was at a rate of about l t0 6 inches per year. Based on studies of their close relatives， the modem elephants， mammoths probably had a gestation period of 22 months， resulting in a single calf being born. Their social structure was probably the same as that of African and Asian elephants， with females living in herds headed by a matriarch， whilst hulls lived solitary lives or formed loose groups after sexual maturity.
B MEXICO CITY-Although it’s hard to imagine in this age of urban sprawl and automobiles， North America once belonged to mammoths， camels， ground sloths as large as cows， bear-size beavers and other formidable beasts. Some 11，000 years ago， however， these large bodied mammals and others-about 70 species in all-disappeared. Their demise coincided roughly with the arrival of humans in the New World and dramatic climatic change-factors that have inspired several theories about the die-off. Yet despite decades of scientific investigation， the exact cause remains a mystery. Now new findings offer support to one of these controversial hypotheses： that human hunting drove this megafaunal menagerie （ 巨型动物兽群）to extinction. The overkill model emerged in the 1960s， when it was put forth by Paul S. Martin of the University of Arizona. Since then， critics have charged that no evidence exists to support the idea that the first Americans hunted to the extent necessary to cause these extinctions. But at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Mexico City last October， paleoecologist John Alroy of the University of California at Santa Barbara argued that， in fact， hunting-driven extinction is not only plausible， it was unavoidable. He has determined， using a computer simulation that even a very modest amount of hunting would have wiped these animals out.
C Assuming an initial human population of 100 people that grew no more than 2 percent annually， Alroy determined that if each band of， say， 50 people killed 15 to 20 large mammals a year， humans could have eliminated the animal populations within 1，000 years. Large mammals in particular would have been vulnerable to the pressure because they have longer gestation periods than smaller mammals and their young require extended care.
D Not everyone agrees with Alroy’s assessment. For one， the results depend in part on population-size estimates for the extinct animals-figures that are not necessarily reliable. But a more specific criticism comes from mammalogist Ross D. E. MacPhee of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City， who points out that the relevant archaeological record contains barely a dozen examples of stone points embedded in mammoth bones （and none， it should be noted， are known from other megafaunal remains）-hardly what one might expect if hunting drove these animals to extinction. Furthermore， some of these species had huge rangesthe giant Jefferson’s ground sloth， for example， lived as far north as the Yukon and as far south as Mexicowhich would have made slaughtering them in numbers sufficient to cause their extinction rather implausible， he says.
E MacPhee agrees that humans most likely brought about these extinctions （as well as others around the world that coincided with human arrival）， but not directly. Rather he suggests that people may have introduced hyperlethal disease， perhaps through their dogs or hitchhiking vermin， which then spread wildly among the immunologically naive species of the New World. As in the overkill model， populations of large mammals would have a harder time recovering. Repeated outbreaks of a hyperdisease could thus quickly drive them to the point of no return. So far MacPhee does not have empirical evidence for the hyperdisease hypothesis， and it won’t be easy to come by： hyperlethal disease would kill far too quickly to leave its signature on the bones themselves. But he hopes that analyses of tissue and DNA from the last mammoths to perish will eventually reveal murderous microbes.
F The third explanation for what brought on this North American extinction does not involve human beings. Instead， its proponents blame the loss on the weather. The Pleistocene epoch witnessed considerable climatic instability， explains paleontologist Russell W. Graham of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. As a result， certain habitats disappeared， and species that had once formed communities split apart. For some animals， this change brought opportunity. For much of the megafauna， however， the increasingly homogeneous environment left them with shrinking geographical ranges-a death sentence for large animals， which need large ranges. Although these creatures managed to maintain viable populations through most of the Pleistocene， the final major fluctuation-the so-called Younger Dryas eventpushed them over the edge， Graham says. For his part， Alroy is convinced that human hunters demolished the titans of the Ice Age. The overkill model explains everything the disease and climate scenarios explain， he asserts， and makes accurate predictions about which species would eventually go extinct. “Personally， I’m a vegetarian，” he remarks， “and I find all of this kind of gross-but believable.”
Passage 3
文章题材：说明文（人文研究）
文章题目：大师是怎样炼成的
文章难度：★★★
文章内容：待补充
题型及数量：4选择+6判断+4填空
题目及答案：
27、C
28、C
29、A
30、A
31、NG
32、T
33、NG
34、NG
35、F
36、待补充
37、tuition
38、eight
39、four
40、inherited
可参考真题：C10T2P2：Gifted Children and Learning
以上信息希望能帮助您在留学申请的道路上少走弯路。如果您还有更多问题或需要深入探讨，不要犹豫，您可以在我们的留学官方网站上找到更丰富的考试资讯、留学指导和一对一专家咨询服务。我们的团队始终站在您的角度，为您的留学梦想全力以赴。祝您申请顺利！
2023雅思阅读真题全面解析及答案(2)
您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！小钟老师为大家带来2023雅思阅读真题全面解析及答案(2)，欢迎大家参考!更多相关内容请关注本站!
2023雅思阅读真题全面解析及答案(2)
原文与译文：
Yesterday, in the House of Commons, Charles Kennedy’s parliamentary colleagues gave moving tributes to his life. There is never a rush, of course, to speak ill of the dead, but these tributes had the clear ring of sincerity. David Cameron said his “character and courage inspired us all”, and Nick Clegg that he always put people before politics. Outside the commons, colleagues and friends have spoken repeatedly of Kennedy’s compassion, decency, and principled nature as well as of his ongoing battle with human frailty in the form of alcoholism.
It seems Charles Kennedy displayed what the New York Times Columnist David Brooks would call “eulogy virtues”. In his most recent book “The Road to Character”, Brooks contrasts eulogy virtues like kindness, faithfulness and humility with what he calls resume virtues - the kind of things we put on our CV. He’s convinced that both eulogy virtues and resume virtues take work to develop, and is worried that western society pushes us to put our efforts into the ones that will help improve our careers, not our characters.
It's the age old question- what makes a good life? How do we go deeper amongst the clamour of a culture that monetises status anxiety and defines us by what earn, own or look like?
David Brook’s call for us to do the hard work of developing character, to cultivate self-restraint and self-suspicion in the age of the selfie stick, isn't really controversial. It's obvious, when we stop to think about it, that the real legacies of our lives aren’t job titles, twitter followers or cellulite free thighs. But how do we develop the eulogy virtues, when the gravitational pull of the self is so strong?
Christians would be the first to acknowledge that these virtues don't come naturally. The church’s hunch is that change happens through vulnerable, committed relationships. To overcome the tyrant self we must confess our frailty and darkest tendencies - first to God, and then to others.
Behavioural science is beginning to add evidence to what religions have long understood - virtue develops best in relational communities. Not short term communities of self interest made up of “people like us”, but awkward, diverse, grace filled communities, established for the long term. The New Testament encourages Christians to be part of communities like these, to encourage one another, bear with each other and create space for the hard conversations. To keep reminding each other of the virtues that matter and the things that last. These kind of communities aren't of course unique to Christianity, and they are often far from perfect, but if we want to be remembered not for our fleeting achievements but our depth of character, they might be the best hope we have.
昨天，在下议院，查尔斯·肯尼迪的同事为他的一生发表了催人泪下的悼词。当然，死者为大，没有人会在死者尸骨未寒时说别人的不是。但是这些悼词很明显是真诚的。大卫·卡梅伦说他的“品格和勇气鼓舞了我们所有人”，尼克·克莱格说他总是把民众放在政治前面。在下议院外，他的同事和朋友多次提到他的同情心，政治和原则性，并不断与人类酗酒的劣根性做斗争。
查尔斯·肯尼迪似乎体现了《纽约时报》专栏作家David Brooks所说的“悼词美德”。在他最近的书《通往品格的道路》中，Brooks将善良，忠诚等悼词美德与他所说的简历美德做了对比——也就是我们写在简历上的品德。他相信，悼词美德和简历美德都需要发扬。他担心西方世界导致我们努力塑造帮助我们职业发展的品德，而不是帮助性格成长的品德。
我们又要说一个老生常谈的问题——怎样才是好的生活?在宣扬金钱至上，追求社会地位，根据收入，财产和外表来定义我们的浮躁社会，我们怎样才能深入剖析自己的内心世界?
David Brook呼吁我们努力塑造品格，在自我吹嘘的环境中培养自制和自审的品格，这并无争议。很明显，当我们停下来认真思考的时候，我们真正宝贵的财产并不是我们的职位，推特粉丝或没有脂肪的大腿。但是在自我的万有引力如此强大的情况下，我们怎样培养悼词美德?
基督徒们将最先站出来承认这些美德并不是与生俱来的。基督教教义认为，改变是在脆弱忠诚的关系中发生的。要克服残暴的自我，我们必须承认我们的脆弱和最黑暗的本性——首先是对上帝，然后是对自己。
行为科学不断有证据表明各宗教很久以前就已经理解的问题——道德在关系社会中发展得最快。不是由“跟我一样的人”组成的短暂的利益团体，而是长期的，尴尬的，多样化的人组成的团体。<<新约圣经>>鼓励基督徒成为这样的团体的一部分，鼓励大家相互容忍，为艰难的对话打造空间。互相提醒非常重要的道德和永恒持久的事情。当然，这些团体并不是对基督教来说独一无二的，而通常并不完美，但是，如果我们不是想要人们记住卓越的成就，而是希望人们记住我们的品德，这或许是我们最大的希望。
词汇解释：
1.moving adj. 感人的
It is very moving to see how much strangers can care for each other...
看到陌生人之间这般彼此关照，实在令人感动。
2.inspire vt. 鼓舞
These herbs will inspire you to try out all sorts of exotic-flavoured dishes!
这些香草会激发你去品尝各种异国风味的菜肴!
3.repeatedly adv.反复地，重复地
A list of items is repeatedly flashed up on the screen.
一个选项列表反复出现在屏幕上。
4.ongoing adj.不间断的，进行的
There is an ongoing debate on the issue.
对此问题的争论一直没有间断过。
5.convince vt.使相信，说服
I'm not going to believe it myself, never mind convince anyone else.
我自己都不会相信，更别提说服别人了。
6.clamour n. 喧哗声，喧闹
She could hear a clamour in the road outside.
她能听得见外面路上的吵闹声。
7.acknowledge vt.承认
You have to acknowledge that we live in a racist society.
你得承认我们生活在一个有种族偏见的社会中。
8.fleeting adj. 疾驰的，飞逝的;短暂的
The world is like a fleeting show.
人世如白驹过隙。
希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及一对一的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！
2023年11月2日雅思阅读考试真题及答案
您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
上周末完成了最新一期的雅思考试，大家一定很想知道自己考得怎么样？来和小钟老师看看2023年11月2日雅思阅读考试真题及答案。
Passage 1
Russia ballet俄罗斯芭蕾/俄罗斯戏剧发展
原文分段大意：第一段17世纪是教会眼制舞蹈发展，然后各个国家对其欧洲的，什么 concert什么舞蹈的演变等，俄罗斯芭蓄舞里面提到了外来的教师什么的。题型是TFNG和filling the table
Questions1-6TRUE/ FALSE/ NOT GIVEN判断题
1说18世纪中期芭蕾流行没---T
2音乐教师数量是否上诉---F
319世纪芭蕾在俄罗斯才 popular---NG
418世纪中期跳芭蕾舞是不是和宗教意见冲突被官方 reject---T
5还问 enthusiasm是否局限于皇家还是什么的---T
6问一个人进入什么组织是否被拒绝了---F
倒数第二个人问一个人是否stop
Questions 7-13） Filling the table
（no more than 2 words /a number）
7-8）第一个theater的建立者Alex是个学院的director
9最后一段末尾讲到一个人很有成就的最后 win worldwidepopularity
10 dance anddress code
11引入了法律相关的舞蹈，社会生活
12 Pushkin普希金-创作获得了成功 Successfulpublication
13一个人 comic摆脱了myth
passage 2
the reconstruction of community
14 paragraph A---vi Introduction of a social housing community with unexpected high standard
15 paragraph B---viii closer relationship among neighbors in original site
16 paragraph C---v problems arise then the mentality of alienation developed later
17 paragraph D---iii details of plans for the community’s makeover and upgrade
18 paragraph E---ix different need from a makeup of a low financial background should be considered
19 paragraph F---vii a practical design and need assist and cooperate in future
20 paragraph G---ii a good tendency of strengthening the supervision
21 design should meet the need of mix-raced cultural background---D
22 for better living environment， regulations and social control should be imperative---B
23 organising more community’s activities helps strengthening relationship in community---C
24 people complain about the high living24 density
25 the designs of many25 architects
26 Build a house within low26 budget
27 in its own27 garden
Passage 3
古犀
希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及一对一的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！
以上就是金博宝188官网整理的请问2023年2月23日雅思阅读考试真题及答案（2023雅思阅读真题全面解析及答案(2)）相关内容，想要了解更多信息，敬请查阅金博宝188官网。
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。
