剑桥雅思9阅读text2答案 2023年11月20日雅思阅读考试真题及答案

最近经常有小伙伴私信询问剑桥雅思9阅读text2答案 2023年11月20日雅思阅读考试真题及答案相关的问题，今天，金博宝188官网小编整理了以下内容，希望可以对大家有所帮助。

本文目录一览：

• 1、2023年9月28日雅思阅读考试真题及答案
• 2、求 雅思九分达人阅读2 test7的答案 三篇文章都要啊！谢谢～
• 3、2023年11月20日雅思阅读考试真题及答案

2023年9月28日雅思阅读考试真题及答案

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
昨天刚刚结束了最新一期的雅思考试，大家有没有被难倒呢？接下来就跟着小钟老师来看一看2023年9月28日雅思阅读考试真题及答案。
Passage1： 希腊硬币Greek coinage
参考答案：
1. 希腊coin早在3000年就出现了=F
2. T
3. Sparta地区侵略Athens并强制Athens用他们的货币=F
4. Great coins在整个欧洲流传=F
5. Persian 入侵了Lydia并且使用人家的硬币=T
6. 用硬币上的头像来奖励做出杰出贡献的人=NG
7. mint
8. stamps
9. anvil
10. reserve dies
11. 希腊硬币的重量至少=0.15g
12. 硬币的图案=the king的头像
13. 希腊被波斯征服之前的花纹是lion and doil
14. coin 在雅典被称为 owl
Passage2： 悉尼交通标识Street markers in Sydney
Passage3： Musical Maladies
参考答案：
A. Music and the brain are both endlessly fascinating subjects， and as a neuroscientist specializing in auditory learning and memory， I find them especially intriguing. So I had high expectations of Musicophilia， the latest offering from neurologist and prolific author Oliver Sacks. And I confess to feeling a little guilty reporting that my reactions to the book are mixed.
B. Sacks himself is the best part of Musicophilia. He richly documents his own life in the book and reveals highly personal experiences. The photograph of him>C. The preface gives a good idea of what the book will deliver. In it Sacks explains that he wants to convey the insights gleaned from the enormous and rapidly growing body of work>complex and often bizarre disorders to which these are prone.＂ He also stresses the importance of the simple art of observation＂ and the richness of the human context. He wants to combine observation and description with the latest in technology，” he says， and to imaginatively enter into the experience of his patients and subjects. The reader can see that Sacks， who has been practicing neurology for 40 years， is torn between the old-fashioned path of observation and the new-fangled， high-tech approach： He knows that he needs to take heed of the latter， but his heart lies with the former.
D. The book consists mainly of detailed descriptions of cases， most of them involving patients whom Sacks has seen in his practice. Brief discussions of contemporary neuroscientific reports are sprinkled liberally throughout the text. Part I， Haunted by Music，＂ begins with the strange case of Tony Cicoria， a nonmusical， middle-aged surgeon who was consumed by a love of music after being hit by lightning. He suddenly began to crave listening to piano music， which he had never cared for in the past. He started to play the piano and then to compose music， which arose spontaneously in his mind in a torrent of notes. How could this happen？ Was I the cause psychological？ （He had had a near-death experience when the lightning struck him.） Or was it the direct result of a change in the auditory regions of his cerebral cortex？ Electro-encephalography （EEG） showed his brain waves to be normal in the mid-1990s， just after his trauma and subsequent conversion to music. There are now more sensitive tests， but Cicoria has declined to undergo them； he does not want to delve into the causes of his musicality. What a shame！
E. Part II， “A Range of Musicality，” covers a wider variety of topics，but unfortunately， some of the chapters offer little or nothing that is new. For example， chapter 13， which is five pages long， merely notes that the blind often have better hearing than the sighted. The most interesting chapters are those that present the strangest cases. Chapter 8 is about “ amusia， ” an inability to hear sounds as music， and “dysharmonia，”a highly specific impairment of the ability to hear harmony， with the ability to understand melody left intact. Such specific dissociations are found throughout the cases Sacks recounts.
F. To Sacks＇s credit， part III， ＂Memory， Movement and Music，＂ brings us into the underappreciated realm of music therapy. Chapter 16 explains how ＂melodic intonation therapy＂ is being used to help expressive aphasic patients （those unable to express their thoughts verbally following a stroke or other cerebral incident）>G. To readers who are unfamiliar with neuroscience and music behavior， Musicophilia may be something of a revelation. But the book will not satisfy those seeking the causes and implications of the phenomena Sacks describes. For>appears to be more at ease discussing patients than discussing experiments. And he tends to be rather uncritical in accepting scientific findings and theories.
H. It＇s true that the causes of music-brain oddities remain poorly understood. However， Sacks could have done more to draw out some of the implications of the careful observations that he and other neurologists have made and of the treatments that have been successful. For example， he might have noted that the many specific dissociations among components of music comprehension， such as loss of the ability to perceive harmony but not melody， indicate that there is no music center in the brain. Because many people who read the book are likely to believe in the brain localization of all mental functions， this was a missed educational opportunity.
I. Another conclusion>patient. Treatments mentioned seem to be almost exclusively antiepileptic medications， which ＂damp down＂ the excitability of the brain in general； their effectiveness varies widely.
J. Finally， in many of the cases described here the patient with music-brain symptoms is reported to have ＂normal＂ EEG results. Although Sacks recognizes the existence of new technologies， among them far more sensitive ways to *yze brain waves than the standard neurological EEG test， he does not call for their use. In fact， although he exhibits the greatest compassion for patients， he conveys no sense of urgency about the pursuit of new avenues in the diagnosis and treatment of music-brain disorders. This absence echoes the book＇s preface， in which Sacks expresses fear that the simple art of observation may be lost＂ if we rely too much on new technologies. He does call for both approaches， though， and we can only hope that the neurological community will respond.
27-30：B C A A
31-36：YES NG NO NG YES NO
37-40：F B A D

希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！

求 雅思九分达人阅读2 test7的答案 三篇文章都要啊！谢谢～

参考答案：1.“苍茫的天底下，是几株草。风很大，草就很低的伏着，身子却透出一股强劲来”。“风很尖锐的呼叫着，把漫天的雪搅得迷迷茫茫”。作用：衬托父子情深。天虽寒，父子的爱心是热的。2.(1)温度高;(2)父亲对儿子的爱是热烘烘的。(3)父子相爱，生活是美好的。3.水壶体现了父子之间真挚的亲情，是连接父子亲情的纽带，所以不*。4.“情绪”是感受，是父亲感受到了儿子关爱父亲的亲情。5.儿子将热水壶递给父亲，使父亲感受到的不只是水壶的暖，更主要的是感受到了儿子的爱，这种亲情的温暖使得门外的风也不具有威慑力

2023年11月20日雅思阅读考试真题及答案

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
雅思的阅读考试，在11月20日的考试中，有了新的变化，来一起看看真题吧。下面是小钟老师整理的2023年11月20日雅思阅读考试真题及答案。
2023年11月20日雅思阅读考试真题
Passage 1
主题：世界上最古老的鞋
参考答案：
Passage 2
主题：捕捉小行星
参考答案：
Passage 3
主题：语言的变化
参考答案：
27-30 填空27.sound laws28.fashion29.imperfect30.principle of ease
31-37 判断31.F32.NG33.NG34.T35.T36.NG37.T
38-40 匹配38.C39.B40.A
雅思阅读评分标准
是直接将答对题目数量划分给对应分数，从9分到0分。其中a类标准稍严于g类，二者是不完全一样的，请注意。具体看下表：
雅思阅读考试类型
雅思A类阅读(学术类)部分共有三篇文章，考生需要回答40道题目。每一篇文章所需要回答的问题数量并不相同。每一道问题相对应一个分数。文章内容和题目均出现于试卷中。
文章介绍
阅读考试中所出现的文章是由真实的文章改写而成的。这些文章来源于诸如杂志、期刊、书籍和报纸等途径，与考生未来在大学课程中将阅读到的文章极为相似。文 章还包括了非文字性的内容，比如图表、曲线图、以及画图等。文章的写作方式多样，比如记叙文、说明文或者议论文等文体。文章的内容包含即将学习本科、研究 生课程或进行职业注册的考生所感兴趣的、与其认知程度相符的常见话题。其中，至少一篇文章会出现详尽的论述形式。所有文章总计长度约在2000到2750 字之间。
雅思G类阅读(培训类)共有三部分，文章难度由浅至深，考生需要回答40道题目。第一部分有14道题，第二和第三部分分别有13道题。
第一部分通常包含2到3篇短文或者若干段文字(如广告等)。第二部分通常有2篇文章，第三部分则为一段较长的文章。文章的内容和文体各有不同，难度最深的为第三部分的内容。
第一部分的内容选自通知、广告、时间表、宣传品、以及其它类似的内容。第二部分的内容选自大学招生简章、课程介绍、大学课程介绍、图书馆指引、规定、以及 其它类似的内容。第三部分的内容选自报纸、杂志、期刊、小说或非虚构的书籍、以及其它类似的内容。所有文章总计长度约在2400字左右。
雅思G类阅读考试评分标准
按照IELTS评分标准，考生每科成绩从1~9共分为九个等级。考生的总分取听、说、读、写四个部分得分之和的平均值，平均值也需按照四舍五入的原则统计，并最终确定考生的雅思总分。今天，新通教育安徽外语专家就和大家来聊聊雅思G类阅读评分标准是什么?希望能解答于雅思考生对于雅思G类阅读评分标准的疑惑。
听力、阅读、写作、总分都有半分的情况存在，最后得分均为取四项成绩的平均值，如果遇到四项平均值为x.25或者x.75时怎么计算?
遇到这种情况还是按照四舍五入的原则计算，但需要尾数大于0.5分才计入上一级分数，尾数小于或者等于0.5则计入同一级分数。例如四项平均分等于或大于5.25分，则计入5的同一级分数，取5.5分;如果平均分等于或大于5.75分，则计入5的上一级分数，取6分。
雅思G类阅读得分与原始分数换算表
听力和阅读都分别有40道题目，每答对一题得一分。最后的分数(原始分 Raw Score)被折算成1-9分的雅思段位。
由于和A类阅读考试相比，雅思G类阅读的题目较简单，所以取得高分相应的需要多对2-3题。由于雅思阅读考试都是相对比较客观的题目，所以不存在雅思阅读成绩复议这个程序。大家在备考雅思阅读考试的时候，可以根据上面的雅思G类阅读评分标准对自己的阅读进行测试。
考试时间为60分钟　共3篇文章　每篇约1000左右(阅读量极大)　40个题目
在考试内容上A类和G类是有一定的差别的：
Academic类与General training类的考题都以"三大段"的文章为基本结构，大约1500-3000字之间，内容多样，甚至有时以图表、表格的方式出现，学生答题的方式亦有多种答题形式，共40题.
阅读部分的主题并不是为了考察学生对学术的专业度或认知度，所以学生千万别因对主题的陌生而紧张起来。
A类与G类内容相同之处在于A类除生活化范畴之外，加入考生在学业上、学术上的探讨与了解，而G类较着重于社会上的、生活化的、工作训练等的主题。

希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！

以上就是金博宝188官网小编整理的内容，想要了解更多相关资讯内容敬请关注金博宝188官网。